60 بالعربي

US Statement on Forced Labor at G20 Limited to Mexico and Argentina

Only Mexico and Argentina signed a US-led statement on forced labor at the G20 trade ministers' meeting, while Washington expressed its disappointment.

October 4, 2026
US Statement on Forced Labor at G20 Limited to Mexico and Argentina
Audio available in Arabic

Listen to this story

0:00
0:54

Signing of the US-led statement on forced labor at the G20 trade ministers' meeting in Milwaukee, US, was limited to Mexico and Argentina only, according to the Express Tribune quoting Reuters.

The US presidency of the meeting, led by Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, described this as a "profound disappointment." However, ministers reached a consensus condemning the weaponization of food trade.

Greer abandoned his push for a joint statement regarding the reform of the "Most Favored Nation" rule in the World Trade Organization. US tariffs of 10% and 12.5% on 59 countries plus the European Union remain in effect, and a second investigation under Section 301 continues to cover 16 trading partners.

This divide highlights the extent of divergence among the world's largest economies over trade rules, amidst ongoing US tariff pressure on key trading partners. The meeting comes as US tariffs and Section 301 investigations remain standing, meaning trade disputes are far from resolved despite the gathering. Markets closely monitor these meetings as they shape trade and commodity flows in the coming months.

What do these terms mean?

G20: A grouping comprising the largest advanced and emerging economies, coordinating on economic and trade issues. Most Favored Nation rule: A WTO rule preventing discrimination between trading partners regarding tariffs and conditions. Section 301: A US legal tool allowing investigations into trade practices of other countries and the imposition of tariffs in response. Forced Labor: The employment of individuals under coercion, threat, or without fair wages. Weaponization of food trade: Using food export bans or restrictions as political leverage.

Share
Keywords